CAUTION:
 The most  sensitive subject (NAMAAZ)  is now being presented with due 
respect. The reader that gets startled and upset at this humble  
submission may stop reading on to avoid further aggravation.
WHO CONTRIVED NAMAAZ (THE RITUAL PRAYER)?
There
 was not one single man who introduced the Namaaz deception into Islam. 
Obviously, no one man could. Such conspiracies have to be 
state-sponsored in order to get hold of  the masses. Think of the 
history of Christianity for a moment. The Pauline doctrine was not 
canonized until Emperor Constantine supported it at the Conference of 
Nicea in 325 CE.
WHAT ACTUALLY IS SALAAT:
2:43
 And establish the Divine System, and set up the Just Economic Order in 
the society. And bow with others who bow to these Commands.  [9:119, 
89:27-30 'Salaat' = To follow closely like a runners-up (Musalli) 
follows the winning horse  (Saabiq). 'Aqimussallat' = Establish the 
System that facilitates the following of Divine Commands]   The Quran 
commands us to remember Allah lying, sitting and standing any time. Call
 it the ritual salaat.
THE IMAMIST CONSPIRACY OF NAMAAZ:
Please
 remind yourself of the famous weird tale of the Prophet (S) ascending 
to heavens to meet with Allah, the so-called Me'raaj  (the word is 
non-existent in  the Quran).  Is not Allah Omnipresent?  The "Imams" of 
Hadith want us to believe that Allah ordained 50 ritual prayers daily 
for Muslims on that occasion. As the exalted Prophet was descending,  
Prophet Moses told him of the impossibility of the situation and sent 
Muhammad (S) back again and again. Imagine the Prophet (S) bargaining 
with God! Repeated visits to and fro then bring the number down to 40, 
30, 20, 10, and finally 5! Moses a. s. wanted him to make one more trip 
but Muhammad (S) felt shy to bargain any further. Was this Hadith, in 
addition to promoting ritualism, fabricated to prove Moses' 
farsightedness over Muhammad (S)? Only an extremely gullible mind would 
accept this nonsense.
The
 later Persian Imams built upon this tale and formulated the current 
Namaaz. They received strong support from the Persian Zoroastrian mother
 of Khalifa Haroon Rasheed, Khaizran (d. 789 CE). Haroon's Zoroastrian 
viziers, the Baramika were only too happy to join hands with the royal 
mother, Khaizran.
So,
 it was she in concert with others who "canonized" Namaaz according to 
the desires of the Criminal  Imams in 153 AH (773 CE). Her main 
philosopher was Imam Al-Khalil bin Ahmad Shikoh, the first ever compiler
 of Arabic to Persian dictionary, Al-'Ain. 
WHY WAS IMAM HANBAL FLOGGED?
Imam
 Ahmad bin Hanbal is reported to have been flogged by Khalifa Mamun son 
of Haroon because Hanbal supposedly insisted that the Quran being the 
Word of God was  Ghair Makhlooq (non-creation). No! That wasn't it. It 
was too trivial a debate. Hanbal got flogged because he saw  and opposed
 the Persian Namaaz (Bandagi or Gah) being incorporated into Islam. 
ANOTHER POINT OF INTEREST:
Khaizran
 spent a fortune on her project and distributed one million gold coins 
and 65 million silver coins among her subjects to propagate the 
'canonized' Namaaz. References are given in the next heading. Less than 
5% Muslims "perform" Namaaz and they keep announcing their prayers. No 
one can say or says, "I have established  Salaat." Yet, most Muslims 
keep arguing about Namaaz.
Experiment:
 Call a random gathering of  Muslims anywhere for Namaaz under 
completely unexpected circumstances. You will notice almost all of them 
joining the lines, most of them without Wudhu (Ablution)! What Exactly 
Was NAMAAZ (Ritual Salaat): As far as I have been able to analytically 
search our history and  Hadith, following was the probable situation in 
the lifetime of the exalted Prophet and Sahaba Kiraam. 
• 
 Ritual prayer or Namaaz was a small part of  Aqamatis-Salaat, i.e. 
establishing the System that facilitates the following of Divine 
Commands. 
•  The ritual prayer was always congregational. 
•  Women and men both formed this congregation, women on the right side of men.
• 
 The frequency and timing of the congregations were determined by the 
State as needed. It was never fixed as five times a day ritual.
• 
 Namaaz was performed with the Imam (Central or local 
governmentofficial) reciting some verses from the Quran relevant to the 
situation at hand as the congregation listened to the Imam. Then the 
Imam would lead two units of prayers standing. 
• 
 Masjid was not a temple of worship. It was the Assembly, the School, 
the Municipality, the Parliament and the Government House. So, after 
that recitation, the leader would discuss real issues about the 
community, entertain questions, present bills, announce decisions of the
 Shura (Counsel) and the Assembly would legislate. People came up with 
their ideas for betterment of the society. Masjid was also the place 
where the leader was elected. 
(Some
 references on the above two headings: *** Haroon Wa Baramikatil Faras 
by Sheikhul Ifta Salman bin Abu Qasim Baghdadi. Vol 1 pg 31-55 *** 
Meezan-il-Faris by Hujjatullah Abdul Qadir Ali Al-Moosvi pg 249-261 
***Takmilatil Lughatal 'Ain 'Urfa by Al-Ustaz Jalaluddin Al-Ash'ari on 
Imam Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad Shikoh Tabrezi vol 2 pg 3-5 ***  
Mujahid-al-Munafiq Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal by Abdul Muhsin bin Mullah Ali 
Al-Qari, pg 67-135) 
HOW QUICKLY WAS THE RITUAL SALAAT CHANGING!
Arif
 Shamim, Karachi Bukhari Vol.1, Book 10, Number 507: Narrated Ghailan: 
Anas bin Malik (A Sahabi) said, "I do not find (now-a-days) things as 
they were (practised) at the time of the Prophet." Somebody said "The 
prayer (is as it was)". Anas said, "Have you not done in the prayer what
 you have done?" 
Bukhari
 Vol.1, Book 10, Number 508: Narrated Az-Zuhri that he visited Anas bin 
Malik at Damascus and found him weeping and asked him why he was 
weeping. He replied, "I do not know anything which I used to know during
 the lifetime of Allah's Apostle except this prayer which is being lost 
(not being offered as it should be)." 
The
 comments, "Have you not done in the prayer what you have done?",and the
 "Lost Prayer" indicate that something went wrong with the Ritual Prayer
 (Namaaz) soon after Sahaba Kiraam.
DOES HADITH EXPLAIN THE METHOD OF NAMAAZ?
The
 Book of Allah claims to be, and certainly is, complete, detailed and 
describes all things divinely ordained. Say this to an N2I. The 
knee-jerk response will be, "No, it does not give you the method of 
Namaaz." Well, did Allah forget? Contrary to the common claims, all the 
books of Hadith combined together will fail to give  you a complete, 
consistent method of Namaaz. 
RITUALISTIC SALAAT BY ITSELF IS NOTHING:
11:87
 They said, "O Shoaib! (We had thought that your religion was only a 
matter between you and your Lord). Does your Salaat command that we 
should forsake the worship that our fathers practised? Or, that we leave
 off doing what we like to do with our economy? Behold, you want us to 
think that you are the only clement, and the rightly guided man among 
us." 
DOES NAMAAZ DO ALL THIS? AQAAMATUSSALAAT SURE DOES:
29:45
 (O Prophet) convey to people all that is revealed to you of the Book, 
and establish the Divine System. For,  verily, establishment of the 
Divine System will shut off lewdness, stinginess and behavior contrary 
to the Divine Values. This is so, because Allah’s Law is the Greatest 
Law that can give you eminence. And (O People) Allah knows whatever you 
contrive on your own. [21:10, 21:24, 23:70, 43:43-44, 70:21-27 - 
‘Fahasha’ includes lewdness and miserliness and ‘Munkar’ is all behavior
 that goes against Divine Values given in the Quran] 
CENTRAL PRAYER:
 What is  Salaatil Wusta? Central Prayer? Middle Namaaz?  Namaaz 'Asr?  
2:238
 Watch all your commitments and especially the Central Duty (of guarding
 of the Divine System). And stay alert in Allah's Cause. 
THE RITUAL PRAYER (NAMAAZ) AND MORE
Ardeshir Spencer
 
 I am a Zoroastrian. Dr. Shabbir's research is quite right. Your NAMAAZ 
was stolen from Zoroastrianism by your Parsi Imams from Persia.  It 
would be appropriate if we can discuss the startling similarities 
between some practices of Islam and Zoroastrianism. These parallels go 
beyond the co-incindental normal ones. I will endeavour to enumerate a 
few here: 
 01. Requirements of prayers: Islam enjoins its followers to pray 5 times a day and is called by the Muezzin to  his prayers.These prayers are at i) Dawn  ii) Noon  iii) Afternoon  iv) Sunset  v) Night.
 Zoroastrianism also enjoins prayers 5 times a day called "Geh". The devotee is summoned by the ringing of a bell in the AtashBehram / Agiary. These prayers are also at the same time as in Islam and their respective names are:
Time: Islamic/ Zorastrianism 
Dawn: Fajar/ Havaan 
Noon: Zohar/ Rapithwan 
Afternoon: Asr/ Uziren 
Evening: Mazreem or Maghrib/ Aiwisuthrem 
Night time: Isha or Ishan/ Ushaen. 
 02. Pre-requisites of Prayer: On 
 entering the mosque and prior to commencing prayers a Muslim has to  
cover his head and wash his face and limbs. Similarly, a Zoroastrian on 
 entering the Agiary will cover his head, wash his face and limbs and  
perform the Padyaab Kusti before commencing his prayers.
 03. The Prayers: Prayers
 in Islam are in Arabic only, though translations/transliterations are 
available. The liturgy has to be conducted in Arabic only. In 
Zoroastrianism too, prayers have to be recited in Avesta or in Pazend 
only. In fact in Aveatan prayers Pazend portions have to be recited in 
an undertone so as not  to break the seamless flow of Avestan 
Manthravani.
04. Sanctum Sanctorum and its veneration: The
 holiest spot in a Mosque is the wall facing Mecca and is called the 
Qiblah. In the Atashbehram/Agiary the room where the Atash Padshah is 
enthroned is also called the Keblaah. A Muslim will perform the Sajdah 
in front of the Qiblah and so also will the Zoroastrian perform the 
Sezdah before his Keblaah. Both involve kneeling down and touching the 
forehead to the ground. 
 05. A Holy Month: In
 Islam Ramzan is the holy month in which all Muslims are required to 
fast in the day and  only break their fast after sunset. In 
Zoroastrianism the month of Bahman has similiar connotations wherein all
 are requested to particularly abstain  from flesh. Perhaps in the age 
of the Sassanian dynasty the month of Bahman was observed as Ramzan is 
now.
 06. Ascent into Heaven: The
 hagiography of Islam assures us that Prophet Mohammad ascended to 
heaven from  Jerusalem on the mythical beast Burrrak. He crossed the 7 
spheres, exchanged greetings with the patriarchs and beheld the glory of
 God.
 
 The Dinkard tells us that at the entreaties of Asho Zarthustra Bahman 
Ameshaspand transcendentally elevated his consciousness to the realm of 
heaven wherein Asho Zarthustra looked at the reflugent majesty of God. A
 similiar journey was attributed to  the virtuous Ardaviraf who visited 
hell, purgatory and heaven during his spiritual journey.
 The
 above similarities are obvious. A more careful research would reveal 
more parallels. However even these points are too close to be dismissed 
as mere coincidences. This means Zoroastrianism has had an enormous 
impact on Islam which is not acknowledged. Everyone agrees Islam owes a 
lot to Judaism and Christianity but I feel that the scholars of Islam 
borrowed very heavily from Iran and this can be perhaps attributed to 
that shadowy figure of Dastur Dinyar (Salman Farsi). This debt is so 
impressive that it had to be consistently downgraded and later denied. 
After all if Islam is supposedly directly inspired by God it cannot be 
seen to be acknowledging any debt to an older faith, specially the faith
 of a nation which Islam has defeated. This may perhaps explain the 
devotion of your Persian Imams to my Faith.
 07. Chinvat Bridge (The SIRAAT BRIDGE): According
 to ancient Persian myth, when a person dies, the soul remains by the 
body for three days. On the fourth, it travels to Chinvat Bridge (the 
Bridge of the Separator, also call  Al-Sirat), accompanied by gods of 
protection. The bridge is "finer than a hair and sharper than a sword" 
and spans a deep chasm teeming with monsters. On the other side of the 
bridge is the gateway to paradise.
08. Hell: Demons
 guard the foot of the bridge and argue with the gods over the soul's 
fate. The actions of the dead person, both good and bad, are weighed, 
and the soul is either allowed to cross or denied access to the bridge. 
Spirits whose evil outweighs their good fall into the demon-infested pit
 to face eternal torment. In this  abyss of the damned, each soul is 
tortured by a GHOUL that represents its sins in life. Once fallen into 
the gulf, no soul can escape the horrors of hell through its own power.
 Zoroaster,
 a sixth century BC religious leader, had warned his followers of this 
obstacle to heaven but he promised to lead his flock safely across. The 
ancient manuscript Gathas (Songs of Zoroaster) explains that the Bridge 
of the Separator "becomes narrow for the wicked," whereas the holy can 
easily pass unharmed. (In Gathas, the fair god Rashnu is named as the 
judge who helps determine who is worthy of salvation and who must be 
damned.) All infidels (non-believers)  fall into hell, which the prophet
 says has been created especially for the "followers of the lie."
 The
 legends are sketchy but assert that Chinvat Bridge is located somewhere
 in the far north. It is a place of filth where the damned endure 
physical tortures and spiritual agony. Souls who are unsuccessful in 
crossing the Chinvat Bridge suffer these torments until AHRAMAN, the 
evil god of ZOROASTRIANISM, is destroyed by the good god Orzmahd during 
the LAST JUDGMENT. As this time, lost spirits are restored to the truth 
since "the lie" has been eradicated, or they face final ANNIHILATION.
Notice
 the similarity? So you guys are actually pagan stone and sun 
worshippers, correct? But your Koran is pure and free from plagiarism.
DUROOD VS SALAWAT
DUROOD
 is a Persian word meaning 'cutting off from the root'. This termwas 
maliciously introduced by the AJAMI (Persian) "Imams".  You probably 
know that 95% of our "Imams" hailed from the defeated Persia. They were 
PARSIS (Zoroastrians, Magians, Majoos), but Muslims in disguise only. 
This
 includes the six Sunni MUHADDITHEEN of "SAHAH SITTAH" (the six 
'authentic' books of Hadith) and the three Shi'a MUHADDITHEEN of "SAHAH 
ARB'AH" (the four ‘authentic’ books of Hadith).   Add "Imam" Tabari 
(d.310 Hijrah), the first historian and exponent of the Quran, plus a 
multitude. 
They
 were "canonized" by the Abbasid caliphs of Baghdad. Why? The caliphs 
were under the influence of their Parsi mothers and wives. Moreover, 
these caliphs and the state-sponsored "Imams" had a synergistic 
relationship. You will not find any ONE of these "Imams" opposing 
kingship and despotism. Rather, they opened the gates for HAREMS, 
slaves, concubines, wine and all kind of luxury, indulgence and 
lavishness for the elite. Anyone criticizing these "Imams" would lose 
his neck under the state-sponsored QAZI'S FATWA (religious edict). 
So,
 DUROOD was implied to mean 'cutting off TAWHEED from its root'. Just as
 SALAT was changed to the Parsi NAMAZ, SALAWAT was denatured into the 
despicable DUROOD.  Now, real SALAWAT is given in the Quran. We don't 
need to quit SALAWAT. 
INNALLAHA WA MALAAIKATIHI YUSALLOON 'ALANNABI. YA AIYYUHALLAZEENA AAMANOO! SALLOO 'ALAYIHI WA SALLIMOO TASLEEMA. 
Here it is: 
33:56
 Verily, Allah and His angels bless the Messenger and support his 
Mission (33:43). O You who have chosen to be graced with belief! Bless 
him and give yourself up to him and his Mission in total submission. 
(4:65, 7:157). 
So,
 we can say and work on SALALLAHU ‘ALYIHI WA SALLAM – or ALLAHUMMA SALLI
 ‘ALA MUHAMMADINWWA BAARIK WA SALLIM Here is the SALAWAT for MU'MINEEN. 
33:43
 He it is Who bestows His blessings upon you, and supports you, and His 
angels, that He may bring you forth from darkness into the Light. And 
Merciful is He, indeed, to those who attain belief. (2:155-157, 
9:10314:1, 14:15, 33:56) 
WATCH YOUR PRAYER RUG!
It’s
 a common myth among Muslims - Never leave your prayer rug unfolded! 
Why? Because the Satan will pray on it otherwise! So what? Let the poor 
kid pray. A similar scare – Never leave the Quran open, otherwise the 
Satan will read it. So, let the poor kid read it ☺
HUMANS CREATED FOR WORSHIP?!
Nay, Allah is in no need of our worship. 
51:56
 And I have not created the ‘jinn’ and the ‘ins’ but that they obey 
(serve) Me alone. [‘Jinn’ = Nomads. ‘Ins’ = Urbanites. Check Surah 72 
Al-Jinn, author’s note, for details. ‘Ibadah’ is usually translated as 
worship but it is better applicable in that sense to idol-worship. And 
since the Quran consistently promotes action over ritual, ‘Ibadah’ means
 obeying Allah by serving His creation] 
14:8
 And Moses said, “If you disbelieve - you and all on earth together, yet
 Allah is indeed Self-Sufficient needing none, Owner of Praise.” 
YOU HUMANS & JINNS!
“Fabi
 ayyi aalaai Rabbikumaa tukazzibaan” (Surah 55, Ar-Rahman). The 
addressees of that verse are ‘you both’. So, many commentators, always 
fond of degrading women, render it as, “O Jinns and men!” But, keeping 
in mind the Big Picture of the Quran, the correct rendition is, "O Men 
and women!" Another frequent error is translating ‘Aala’ as blessing, 
bounty or favor. That meaning falls completely and repeatedly out of 
line in the Surah. How can the Hell be a bounty? Another meaning of 
‘Aala’ is Authority, Power and Control, and that is what goes consistent
 throughout the verses in the Surah.  Hence, the correct rendition of 
the verse will be: Then, O Men and women! Which Authority of your Lord 
will you deny? (Instead of: Then, O Jinns and men! Which bounty of your 
Lord will you deny?)  
No comments:
Post a Comment