CAUTION:
The most sensitive subject (NAMAAZ) is now being presented with due
respect. The reader that gets startled and upset at this humble
submission may stop reading on to avoid further aggravation.
WHO CONTRIVED NAMAAZ (THE RITUAL PRAYER)?
There
was not one single man who introduced the Namaaz deception into Islam.
Obviously, no one man could. Such conspiracies have to be
state-sponsored in order to get hold of the masses. Think of the
history of Christianity for a moment. The Pauline doctrine was not
canonized until Emperor Constantine supported it at the Conference of
Nicea in 325 CE.
WHAT ACTUALLY IS SALAAT:
2:43
And establish the Divine System, and set up the Just Economic Order in
the society. And bow with others who bow to these Commands. [9:119,
89:27-30 'Salaat' = To follow closely like a runners-up (Musalli)
follows the winning horse (Saabiq). 'Aqimussallat' = Establish the
System that facilitates the following of Divine Commands] The Quran
commands us to remember Allah lying, sitting and standing any time. Call
it the ritual salaat.
THE IMAMIST CONSPIRACY OF NAMAAZ:
Please
remind yourself of the famous weird tale of the Prophet (S) ascending
to heavens to meet with Allah, the so-called Me'raaj (the word is
non-existent in the Quran). Is not Allah Omnipresent? The "Imams" of
Hadith want us to believe that Allah ordained 50 ritual prayers daily
for Muslims on that occasion. As the exalted Prophet was descending,
Prophet Moses told him of the impossibility of the situation and sent
Muhammad (S) back again and again. Imagine the Prophet (S) bargaining
with God! Repeated visits to and fro then bring the number down to 40,
30, 20, 10, and finally 5! Moses a. s. wanted him to make one more trip
but Muhammad (S) felt shy to bargain any further. Was this Hadith, in
addition to promoting ritualism, fabricated to prove Moses'
farsightedness over Muhammad (S)? Only an extremely gullible mind would
accept this nonsense.
The
later Persian Imams built upon this tale and formulated the current
Namaaz. They received strong support from the Persian Zoroastrian mother
of Khalifa Haroon Rasheed, Khaizran (d. 789 CE). Haroon's Zoroastrian
viziers, the Baramika were only too happy to join hands with the royal
mother, Khaizran.
So,
it was she in concert with others who "canonized" Namaaz according to
the desires of the Criminal Imams in 153 AH (773 CE). Her main
philosopher was Imam Al-Khalil bin Ahmad Shikoh, the first ever compiler
of Arabic to Persian dictionary, Al-'Ain.
WHY WAS IMAM HANBAL FLOGGED?
Imam
Ahmad bin Hanbal is reported to have been flogged by Khalifa Mamun son
of Haroon because Hanbal supposedly insisted that the Quran being the
Word of God was Ghair Makhlooq (non-creation). No! That wasn't it. It
was too trivial a debate. Hanbal got flogged because he saw and opposed
the Persian Namaaz (Bandagi or Gah) being incorporated into Islam.
ANOTHER POINT OF INTEREST:
Khaizran
spent a fortune on her project and distributed one million gold coins
and 65 million silver coins among her subjects to propagate the
'canonized' Namaaz. References are given in the next heading. Less than
5% Muslims "perform" Namaaz and they keep announcing their prayers. No
one can say or says, "I have established Salaat." Yet, most Muslims
keep arguing about Namaaz.
Experiment:
Call a random gathering of Muslims anywhere for Namaaz under
completely unexpected circumstances. You will notice almost all of them
joining the lines, most of them without Wudhu (Ablution)! What Exactly
Was NAMAAZ (Ritual Salaat): As far as I have been able to analytically
search our history and Hadith, following was the probable situation in
the lifetime of the exalted Prophet and Sahaba Kiraam.
•
Ritual prayer or Namaaz was a small part of Aqamatis-Salaat, i.e.
establishing the System that facilitates the following of Divine
Commands.
• The ritual prayer was always congregational.
• Women and men both formed this congregation, women on the right side of men.
•
The frequency and timing of the congregations were determined by the
State as needed. It was never fixed as five times a day ritual.
•
Namaaz was performed with the Imam (Central or local
governmentofficial) reciting some verses from the Quran relevant to the
situation at hand as the congregation listened to the Imam. Then the
Imam would lead two units of prayers standing.
•
Masjid was not a temple of worship. It was the Assembly, the School,
the Municipality, the Parliament and the Government House. So, after
that recitation, the leader would discuss real issues about the
community, entertain questions, present bills, announce decisions of the
Shura (Counsel) and the Assembly would legislate. People came up with
their ideas for betterment of the society. Masjid was also the place
where the leader was elected.
(Some
references on the above two headings: *** Haroon Wa Baramikatil Faras
by Sheikhul Ifta Salman bin Abu Qasim Baghdadi. Vol 1 pg 31-55 ***
Meezan-il-Faris by Hujjatullah Abdul Qadir Ali Al-Moosvi pg 249-261
***Takmilatil Lughatal 'Ain 'Urfa by Al-Ustaz Jalaluddin Al-Ash'ari on
Imam Al-Khalil ibn Ahmad Shikoh Tabrezi vol 2 pg 3-5 ***
Mujahid-al-Munafiq Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal by Abdul Muhsin bin Mullah Ali
Al-Qari, pg 67-135)
HOW QUICKLY WAS THE RITUAL SALAAT CHANGING!
Arif
Shamim, Karachi Bukhari Vol.1, Book 10, Number 507: Narrated Ghailan:
Anas bin Malik (A Sahabi) said, "I do not find (now-a-days) things as
they were (practised) at the time of the Prophet." Somebody said "The
prayer (is as it was)". Anas said, "Have you not done in the prayer what
you have done?"
Bukhari
Vol.1, Book 10, Number 508: Narrated Az-Zuhri that he visited Anas bin
Malik at Damascus and found him weeping and asked him why he was
weeping. He replied, "I do not know anything which I used to know during
the lifetime of Allah's Apostle except this prayer which is being lost
(not being offered as it should be)."
The
comments, "Have you not done in the prayer what you have done?",and the
"Lost Prayer" indicate that something went wrong with the Ritual Prayer
(Namaaz) soon after Sahaba Kiraam.
DOES HADITH EXPLAIN THE METHOD OF NAMAAZ?
The
Book of Allah claims to be, and certainly is, complete, detailed and
describes all things divinely ordained. Say this to an N2I. The
knee-jerk response will be, "No, it does not give you the method of
Namaaz." Well, did Allah forget? Contrary to the common claims, all the
books of Hadith combined together will fail to give you a complete,
consistent method of Namaaz.
RITUALISTIC SALAAT BY ITSELF IS NOTHING:
11:87
They said, "O Shoaib! (We had thought that your religion was only a
matter between you and your Lord). Does your Salaat command that we
should forsake the worship that our fathers practised? Or, that we leave
off doing what we like to do with our economy? Behold, you want us to
think that you are the only clement, and the rightly guided man among
us."
DOES NAMAAZ DO ALL THIS? AQAAMATUSSALAAT SURE DOES:
29:45
(O Prophet) convey to people all that is revealed to you of the Book,
and establish the Divine System. For, verily, establishment of the
Divine System will shut off lewdness, stinginess and behavior contrary
to the Divine Values. This is so, because Allah’s Law is the Greatest
Law that can give you eminence. And (O People) Allah knows whatever you
contrive on your own. [21:10, 21:24, 23:70, 43:43-44, 70:21-27 -
‘Fahasha’ includes lewdness and miserliness and ‘Munkar’ is all behavior
that goes against Divine Values given in the Quran]
CENTRAL PRAYER:
What is Salaatil Wusta? Central Prayer? Middle Namaaz? Namaaz 'Asr?
2:238
Watch all your commitments and especially the Central Duty (of guarding
of the Divine System). And stay alert in Allah's Cause.
THE RITUAL PRAYER (NAMAAZ) AND MORE
Ardeshir Spencer
I am a Zoroastrian. Dr. Shabbir's research is quite right. Your NAMAAZ
was stolen from Zoroastrianism by your Parsi Imams from Persia. It
would be appropriate if we can discuss the startling similarities
between some practices of Islam and Zoroastrianism. These parallels go
beyond the co-incindental normal ones. I will endeavour to enumerate a
few here:
01. Requirements of prayers: Islam enjoins its followers to pray 5 times a day and is called by the Muezzin to his prayers.These prayers are at i) Dawn ii) Noon iii) Afternoon iv) Sunset v) Night.
Zoroastrianism also enjoins prayers 5 times a day called "Geh". The devotee is summoned by the ringing of a bell in the AtashBehram / Agiary. These prayers are also at the same time as in Islam and their respective names are:
Time: Islamic/ Zorastrianism
Dawn: Fajar/ Havaan
Noon: Zohar/ Rapithwan
Afternoon: Asr/ Uziren
Evening: Mazreem or Maghrib/ Aiwisuthrem
Night time: Isha or Ishan/ Ushaen.
02. Pre-requisites of Prayer: On
entering the mosque and prior to commencing prayers a Muslim has to
cover his head and wash his face and limbs. Similarly, a Zoroastrian on
entering the Agiary will cover his head, wash his face and limbs and
perform the Padyaab Kusti before commencing his prayers.
03. The Prayers: Prayers
in Islam are in Arabic only, though translations/transliterations are
available. The liturgy has to be conducted in Arabic only. In
Zoroastrianism too, prayers have to be recited in Avesta or in Pazend
only. In fact in Aveatan prayers Pazend portions have to be recited in
an undertone so as not to break the seamless flow of Avestan
Manthravani.
04. Sanctum Sanctorum and its veneration: The
holiest spot in a Mosque is the wall facing Mecca and is called the
Qiblah. In the Atashbehram/Agiary the room where the Atash Padshah is
enthroned is also called the Keblaah. A Muslim will perform the Sajdah
in front of the Qiblah and so also will the Zoroastrian perform the
Sezdah before his Keblaah. Both involve kneeling down and touching the
forehead to the ground.
05. A Holy Month: In
Islam Ramzan is the holy month in which all Muslims are required to
fast in the day and only break their fast after sunset. In
Zoroastrianism the month of Bahman has similiar connotations wherein all
are requested to particularly abstain from flesh. Perhaps in the age
of the Sassanian dynasty the month of Bahman was observed as Ramzan is
now.
06. Ascent into Heaven: The
hagiography of Islam assures us that Prophet Mohammad ascended to
heaven from Jerusalem on the mythical beast Burrrak. He crossed the 7
spheres, exchanged greetings with the patriarchs and beheld the glory of
God.
The Dinkard tells us that at the entreaties of Asho Zarthustra Bahman
Ameshaspand transcendentally elevated his consciousness to the realm of
heaven wherein Asho Zarthustra looked at the reflugent majesty of God. A
similiar journey was attributed to the virtuous Ardaviraf who visited
hell, purgatory and heaven during his spiritual journey.
The
above similarities are obvious. A more careful research would reveal
more parallels. However even these points are too close to be dismissed
as mere coincidences. This means Zoroastrianism has had an enormous
impact on Islam which is not acknowledged. Everyone agrees Islam owes a
lot to Judaism and Christianity but I feel that the scholars of Islam
borrowed very heavily from Iran and this can be perhaps attributed to
that shadowy figure of Dastur Dinyar (Salman Farsi). This debt is so
impressive that it had to be consistently downgraded and later denied.
After all if Islam is supposedly directly inspired by God it cannot be
seen to be acknowledging any debt to an older faith, specially the faith
of a nation which Islam has defeated. This may perhaps explain the
devotion of your Persian Imams to my Faith.
07. Chinvat Bridge (The SIRAAT BRIDGE): According
to ancient Persian myth, when a person dies, the soul remains by the
body for three days. On the fourth, it travels to Chinvat Bridge (the
Bridge of the Separator, also call Al-Sirat), accompanied by gods of
protection. The bridge is "finer than a hair and sharper than a sword"
and spans a deep chasm teeming with monsters. On the other side of the
bridge is the gateway to paradise.
08. Hell: Demons
guard the foot of the bridge and argue with the gods over the soul's
fate. The actions of the dead person, both good and bad, are weighed,
and the soul is either allowed to cross or denied access to the bridge.
Spirits whose evil outweighs their good fall into the demon-infested pit
to face eternal torment. In this abyss of the damned, each soul is
tortured by a GHOUL that represents its sins in life. Once fallen into
the gulf, no soul can escape the horrors of hell through its own power.
Zoroaster,
a sixth century BC religious leader, had warned his followers of this
obstacle to heaven but he promised to lead his flock safely across. The
ancient manuscript Gathas (Songs of Zoroaster) explains that the Bridge
of the Separator "becomes narrow for the wicked," whereas the holy can
easily pass unharmed. (In Gathas, the fair god Rashnu is named as the
judge who helps determine who is worthy of salvation and who must be
damned.) All infidels (non-believers) fall into hell, which the prophet
says has been created especially for the "followers of the lie."
The
legends are sketchy but assert that Chinvat Bridge is located somewhere
in the far north. It is a place of filth where the damned endure
physical tortures and spiritual agony. Souls who are unsuccessful in
crossing the Chinvat Bridge suffer these torments until AHRAMAN, the
evil god of ZOROASTRIANISM, is destroyed by the good god Orzmahd during
the LAST JUDGMENT. As this time, lost spirits are restored to the truth
since "the lie" has been eradicated, or they face final ANNIHILATION.
Notice
the similarity? So you guys are actually pagan stone and sun
worshippers, correct? But your Koran is pure and free from plagiarism.
DUROOD VS SALAWAT
DUROOD
is a Persian word meaning 'cutting off from the root'. This termwas
maliciously introduced by the AJAMI (Persian) "Imams". You probably
know that 95% of our "Imams" hailed from the defeated Persia. They were
PARSIS (Zoroastrians, Magians, Majoos), but Muslims in disguise only.
This
includes the six Sunni MUHADDITHEEN of "SAHAH SITTAH" (the six
'authentic' books of Hadith) and the three Shi'a MUHADDITHEEN of "SAHAH
ARB'AH" (the four ‘authentic’ books of Hadith). Add "Imam" Tabari
(d.310 Hijrah), the first historian and exponent of the Quran, plus a
multitude.
They
were "canonized" by the Abbasid caliphs of Baghdad. Why? The caliphs
were under the influence of their Parsi mothers and wives. Moreover,
these caliphs and the state-sponsored "Imams" had a synergistic
relationship. You will not find any ONE of these "Imams" opposing
kingship and despotism. Rather, they opened the gates for HAREMS,
slaves, concubines, wine and all kind of luxury, indulgence and
lavishness for the elite. Anyone criticizing these "Imams" would lose
his neck under the state-sponsored QAZI'S FATWA (religious edict).
So,
DUROOD was implied to mean 'cutting off TAWHEED from its root'. Just as
SALAT was changed to the Parsi NAMAZ, SALAWAT was denatured into the
despicable DUROOD. Now, real SALAWAT is given in the Quran. We don't
need to quit SALAWAT.
INNALLAHA WA MALAAIKATIHI YUSALLOON 'ALANNABI. YA AIYYUHALLAZEENA AAMANOO! SALLOO 'ALAYIHI WA SALLIMOO TASLEEMA.
Here it is:
33:56
Verily, Allah and His angels bless the Messenger and support his
Mission (33:43). O You who have chosen to be graced with belief! Bless
him and give yourself up to him and his Mission in total submission.
(4:65, 7:157).
So,
we can say and work on SALALLAHU ‘ALYIHI WA SALLAM – or ALLAHUMMA SALLI
‘ALA MUHAMMADINWWA BAARIK WA SALLIM Here is the SALAWAT for MU'MINEEN.
33:43
He it is Who bestows His blessings upon you, and supports you, and His
angels, that He may bring you forth from darkness into the Light. And
Merciful is He, indeed, to those who attain belief. (2:155-157,
9:10314:1, 14:15, 33:56)
WATCH YOUR PRAYER RUG!
It’s
a common myth among Muslims - Never leave your prayer rug unfolded!
Why? Because the Satan will pray on it otherwise! So what? Let the poor
kid pray. A similar scare – Never leave the Quran open, otherwise the
Satan will read it. So, let the poor kid read it ☺
HUMANS CREATED FOR WORSHIP?!
Nay, Allah is in no need of our worship.
51:56
And I have not created the ‘jinn’ and the ‘ins’ but that they obey
(serve) Me alone. [‘Jinn’ = Nomads. ‘Ins’ = Urbanites. Check Surah 72
Al-Jinn, author’s note, for details. ‘Ibadah’ is usually translated as
worship but it is better applicable in that sense to idol-worship. And
since the Quran consistently promotes action over ritual, ‘Ibadah’ means
obeying Allah by serving His creation]
14:8
And Moses said, “If you disbelieve - you and all on earth together, yet
Allah is indeed Self-Sufficient needing none, Owner of Praise.”
YOU HUMANS & JINNS!
“Fabi
ayyi aalaai Rabbikumaa tukazzibaan” (Surah 55, Ar-Rahman). The
addressees of that verse are ‘you both’. So, many commentators, always
fond of degrading women, render it as, “O Jinns and men!” But, keeping
in mind the Big Picture of the Quran, the correct rendition is, "O Men
and women!" Another frequent error is translating ‘Aala’ as blessing,
bounty or favor. That meaning falls completely and repeatedly out of
line in the Surah. How can the Hell be a bounty? Another meaning of
‘Aala’ is Authority, Power and Control, and that is what goes consistent
throughout the verses in the Surah. Hence, the correct rendition of
the verse will be: Then, O Men and women! Which Authority of your Lord
will you deny? (Instead of: Then, O Jinns and men! Which bounty of your
Lord will you deny?)
No comments:
Post a Comment